These days, with legal dramas so popular on the telly, even laypersons are familiar with the verbiage used nearly exclusively in the courtroom.
Whether they originate in our country or from across the pond – Suits, a legal drama from which our own Duchess of Sussex is an alumnus… all of these programmes hold an unrivalled attraction for us, don’t they?
The thing about television programmes is that they tend to be both watered down and accelerated: you may be sure that no murder trial actually only takes 45 minutes, and there is substantially more legal manoeuvering going on in a real court case.
Even though show producers are very careful to use the right terminology, going so far as to hire legal consultants to ensure accuracy, they still only scratch the surface of the language every barrister, solicitor and judge must know.
A writ of habeas corpus, a priori, non compos mentis… appellant, perjury and adjudication…
Let your Superprof now expound on some of the lesser-known glossary terms that every law student must learn.
Your law books will contain a substantial amount of language specific to the law Source: Pixabay Credit: 193584
One word that features prominently in the news these days is ‘asylum’, whose legal definition is protection and immunity from extradition granted by a government to a political refugee from another country.
More recently: the legal definition for asylum has been extended to people fleeing domestic abuse and violence, the overwhelming majority of them being female.
You may be familiar with the term Crown Courts: they deal with more serious offences such as murder and rape.
Should you plead ‘not guilty’ to the charges against you, your case would be heard by a jury and presided over by a judge.
As evidence is presented, you would be seated in the dock – a sheltered area generally located behind counsels’ tables. If you are found culpable, another word for ‘guilty’, you will be sentenced.
A solicitor may argue: “Pursuant to statute XYZ, we urge the court to find my client not guilty of all charges.”
In legalese, ‘pursuant to’ means ‘in accordance with’ or ‘as a result of’.
So what your solicitor is actually saying is that you could not possibly be found guilty because someone before you committed that same act, was found not guilty, and a law was drafted to that effect.
In the next segment, we will disclose exactly what a solicitor is and how they differ from a barrister.
For now, know only that a solicitor is a law practitioner who has successfully passed all exams pertaining to legal studies and is recognised by the SRA.
SRA: Solicitor’s Regulation Authority. Their job is to ensure that all solicitors meet high standards of morals and ethics, and to act when there is a concern about the conduct of any solicitor.
If said conduct is found to be less than honourable, that solicitor may be struck off – meaning their name is taken off the roll of solicitors.
Other common legal terms include:
plaintiff: the one who brings the complaint, otherwise known as the charge
in civil cases, a plaintiff may also be known as a petitioner
defendant: the party who must answer to the complaint
a civil case would label this party a respondent
proceeding: the legal machinations that bring about a resolution to a dispute
a civil action might call for mediation and/or dispute resolution before any court proceedings occur
judgment: the award the successful party is entitled to
judgment can be either for the plaintiff or the defendant
tort: essentially a wrongdoing that leads to civil liability (not a criminal liability!)
statutory: permitted or required by a statute (law)
compensation: the award deemed suitable by the judge to make up for a loss and/or suffering
affidavit: a written statement, confirmed by oath and presented as evidence in court.
Litigation: the process of taking legal action
appellate: with regard to appeals
one may engage an appellate lawyer to have one’s case heard in appellate court, should judgment be found unsatisfactory
To be sure, there is an entire lexicon of terms used in the legal field. However, as we are not attempting to write such a volume, we’ll feature only one more, highly important, term.
Reasonable doubt is crucial to the criminal law process.
Unless they present in the commission of a crime, nobody knows exactly what the defendant did or didn’t do, and so much of a prosecution’s case is speculation: what might have actually happened?
It is the defence attorney’s job to create reasonable doubt in the jury’s mind.
“Events could also have happened a different way” s/he might say. “Picture this…” thus leading the jury to entertain the possibility that the accused may not have done the deed.
Perhaps s/he might suggest someone else altogether, or infer the possibility of mitigating circumstances that would cause the defendant to act in a criminal manner, in an effort to minimise culpability.
Proving a case beyond a reasonable doubt is the job of the prosecutor. Creating that doubt is the primary function of every criminal defence attorney.
Navigating the intricacies of the law requires thorough knowledge of the verbiage and symbols! Source: Pixabay Credit: Das Wortgewand
A barrister is a lawyer regulated by the Bar Standards Board. They mostly specialise in courtroom representation and drafting briefs. They also render expert legal opinions.
A solicitor is a lawyer who is listed on the roll of solicitors.
Solicitors generally have more access to clients, but barristers can act as a check on solicitors.
For example, if a litigant is not properly represented in court, it is the barrister’s job to advise that client of possible further legal avenues to pursue in his/her case.
A barrister’s training is more extensive than a solicitor’s, including (but not limited to) ethics training, courtroom procedure and the laws of evidence.
A solicitor does a lot of the legal drudge work: preparatory and administrative work for cases. They generally do the day-to-day work of managing cases.
Furthermore, a solicitor may assist a barrister in court by managing and cataloguing volumes of documentation and evidence. They may even negotiate settlements on behalf of clients.
Clearly, these two roles fulfil different functions in our legal system and their titles are not interchangeable.
What about counsellors? Where do they fit in?
A counsellor is more on par with a barrister: someone who gives advice – or counsels clients, but perhaps does not actively represent them.
However, it is common to refer to both solicitors and barristers as counsellor address them as counsellors.
In this table, you may find more everyday law terms you may have heard before but weren’t quite sure of their meaning.
|chambers||describes a collection of barristers who share the expense of an office and clerks|
|hearing||A process that happens before a trial, perhaps to discuss a facet of the case|
|Legal disciplinary practice||a law firm where solicitors work alongside other types of lawyers, such as a licensed conveyancer, and a limited number of clerks.|
|limited liability partnership (LLP)||An arrangement between law partners in which each partner has limited liability in their legal and financial obligations to the partnership|
|paralegal||often trained in law but without qualifications to practice; they support lawyers in researching, cataloging and drafting briefs|
|rights of audience||the right that lawyers have to appear and conduct court proceedings for their clients|
|conciliation||a different means of dispute resolution in which a conciliator works with the parties separately and together|
|mediation||a means of resolving a dispute without litigating the issue|
|arbitration||a third party - an abitrator listens to both parties of a dispute and decides how it should be resolved
NOTE: arbitration, mediation and conciliation are all different processes!
|tribunal||a person or group of persons who all have the authority to determine dispute settlements|
Let us now move on to the language formulated in ancient times, by one of the very first legal societies.
This Roman soldier may have spoken fluent legalese! Source: Pixabay Credit: Wajari
We owe much of our legal structures and legal terms to Ancient Rome. In fact, our concepts and ideas of civil law originated in the Roman Republic (753-31BCE), as did the Law of Nations.
So impactful was the Roman system of law that it helped shape Europe’s legal systems, and we see their effect still today, even in countries that enjoyed no direct Roman influence, such as Germany.
Here is how it worked.
When no law was found within the country’s statutes to address a particular grievance, Roman law was applied. Thus it became known as subsidiary law and, when necessary, bore the full weight of any indigenous German law.
As Latin was, for so long, the lingua franca of the world and, with the proliferation of Romans as far as the Empire stretched; with their laws being absolute, it stands to reason that much of our legal vocabulary would have originated in Rome and endured through the times and the tongues that spoke it.
Earlier we mentioned a writ of habeas corpus.
That is a court order, usually to some restraining body such as a prison, to release the prisoner so that s/he might appear before the court to decide if detention is indeed warranted.
The term was first used in the Magna Charta that stated: ‘No free man shall be imprisoned… without due process of the law.
Another very common Latin term used in our courts today is amicus curiae: a friend of the court. That is a person who offers information pertaining to the case currently being heard.
Corpus delecti is a particularly delectable phrase meaning that one cannot be convicted of a crime without it being proven that a crime has actually occurred.
De jure, often heard in legal proceedings, means ‘according to law’ (it literally translates to ‘from law’.)
De facto is the opposite of de jure; it means what routinely happens, as opposed to what happens under the law.
Those opposite meanings obviously indicate that not everything that happens must happen under a legal construct.
It is often de facto instances, suddenly found egregious, that are brought to civil court!
Ad litem describes those charged with representing those who cannot represent themselves, such as minors or adults who are incapacitated.
You might have heard the phrase ‘guardian ad litem’ to describe a foster parent, for example.
By no means are we attempting to compile a legal dictionary – in Latin or English; your Superprof just hopes to give you a bit of insight into the legal terminology you might hear during court proceedings, whether you witness them on the telly or in person.
Here are a few more you might use during your law career:
|a mensa et thoro||from table to bed||Indicates legal separation without a legal divorce|
|animus nocendi||intent to harm||the subjective state of mind of someone intending to commit a crime with the full knowledge that said actions would be illegal|
|ceteris peribus||with the other things the same||equivalent to 'all other things being equal'|
|res communis||common to all||someone claims exclusive right to something commonly available, such as air, that everyone has access to|
|per curiam||through the court||a decision is said to be authored by the court rather than a specific judge|
|nisi prius||unless first||referring to the court of original jurisdiction|
|mens rea||guilty mind||one of two requirements for a crime to be committed (the other is actus reus)|
|sui juris||of his own right||describing one who is legally able to take care of his own affairs (also spelled sui iuris)|
|felo de se||felon of self||describing a suicide|
|gravamen||things weighing down||describing the basic element of a lawsuit|